Dear TAC: Congratulations on a beautiful Vol. 23. No. 2! Obviously, you have not only a large readership, but a very intelligent group, since we have been getting many emails and calls regarding our article. "A Comparison of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation Alone or with Chiropractic Therapies," which began on page 39. You will recall that you traded us back a smaller study that we had done using just CES alone (without chiropractic therapies), and we sent you the larger study that you published. Unfortunately, the graphs that were published on page 40 were the graphs from the smaller study, instead of those that went with the larger study. Thai is what your intelligent readers are calling us about on a daily basis. I don't know if it can make any difference now. but 1 am enclosing the two graphs that went with the article that you published. Note that they both show a comparison of CES alone and CES plus chiropractic therapy, while the published graphs show the CES findings alone. Again, you did your usual beautiful job. Congratulations! Ray B. Smith, Ph.D. Editor's Note: Well, that is absolutely the nicest wax anyone has ever pointed out a mistake in our magazine! We do profoundly apologize for the mix-up, and encourage our readers to refer to our website, www .amchiropractor.com. in the "Past Issues" section, for the article, itself, along with the appropriate graphs. For those of you without access to the internet, the missing graphs are included here.
