Snoring and Sleep Apnea Structural Implications

April 1 2005 George B.Roth
Snoring and Sleep Apnea Structural Implications
April 1 2005 George B.Roth

Upper airway obstruction (UAO) may be partial, in the case of snoring, or complete, in the case of obstructive sleep apnea. Narrowing of the upper airway, during sleep, causes this often serious condi­tion, affecting millions of people worldwide. T llli UVULA AND SOFT 1'ALLF.T MAY come into partial or total con­tact on the back wall of the up­per airway. When the contact is partial or intermittent, snoring (a loud vibration of these soft tissues) may re­sult. The tongue may also drop posteri­orly onto the back wall of the upper air­way, coming into contact with the uvula and soft pallet, thus forming a tight block­age, preventing any air from entering the lungs. Respiratory effort on the part of the diaphragm and chest may cause the blockage to seal tighter. In order to breathe, the person must arouse or awaken, causing tension in the tongue and, thereby, opening the airway, allow­ing air to pass into the lungs. Apnea, sleep apnea or obstructive sleep apnea is defined as the cessation of breathing for 10 or more seconds while asleep.1 Tradi­tional methods of treatment usually in­volve Continuous Positive Airway Pres­sure (CPAP) devices. Matrix Repatterning techniques were used in ten cases of long-standing, moderate to severe cases of upper airway obstruction. Matrix Repatterning Matrix Repatterning uses a manual scanning procedure to determine the lo­cation of primary structural restrictions, followed by mechanical testing to deter­mine specific vectors of fascial tension. Treatment is generally applied manually, with light force directed into the re­sistance barriers. Matrix Repatterning is based on a revolutionary, new model of the underlying structure of organic tissue—the Tensegrity Matrix— which explains the complex interrela­tionship of all the structural compo­nents of the body. It extends the ba­sic concept of the tissue response to injury, beyond the level of joint, muscle and ligament, to include all % structures of the body as potential sources of dysfunction.2 The tensegrity matrix model of the body, as elaborated by Stephen Levin, M.D.'and Donald Ingber, M.D., Ph.D.,4 holds that the body tissues are composed of interconnected tension icosahedra (complex triangular trusses), which inher­ently provide a balance between stabil­ity and mobility. This structural model explains many of the observed phenom­ena related to body support, movement, response to stress and trauma, as well as the effects of various therapeutic inter­ventions. This theory has been verified by several studies in recent years. Ac­cording to Ingber, a key investigator who has proven the existence of this struc­tural model at the cellular level, "The prin­ciples of tensegrity apply at essentially every detectable size scale in the human body. At the macroscopic level, the 206 bones that constitute our skeleton are pulled up against the force of gravity and stabilized in a vertical form by the pull of tensile muscles, tendons and ligaments. In other words, in the complex tensegrity structure inside every one of us, bones are the compression struts, and muscles, tendons and ligaments are the tension-bearing members."4 Mechanism of Upper Airway Obstruction The upper airway is constructed of the hard and soft palate above, the posterior pharynx, the tongue, and the epiglottis at the level of the tracheo-esophageal junction below. There are several mecha­nisms of partial or complete obstruction . When the ability of the tissues to adapt or compensate becomes overwhelmed by mechanical or physiologic stress, the fas-cial system responds by altering the pat­terns of tension and elasticity. The tensegrity matrix explains the physiologic changes, which manifest in injured or strained tissue. The apparent fibrosis of muscle and fascia can be seen as an al- tered electro-mechanical relationship at the molecular level. The matrix is, thus, converted from a neutral, flexible form to a strained, high-energy, linearly-stiffened mode as shown in Figure 1. Obstruction may occur by approxima­tion of several structures and tissues. This may include the soft palate retract­ing toward the posterior pharyngeal wall, the soft palate descending to approximate the posterior aspect of the tongue, the tongue retracting toward the posterior pharynx, or descending to approximate the epiglottis. These tissues may devi­ate from their functional positions within the upper airway due to a number of structural dysfunctions, including cranial vertex or occipital trauma, leading to de­scent and/or protraction of the cranial base, along with the maxillary portion of the roof of the upper airway. Vertex com­pression, in our studies, has also shown a tendency to lead to radial expansion of the upper cervical vertebrae (an intraosseous deformation), leading to loss of anterior/posterior dimension of the upper airway. Facial trauma may cause deviation of the maxilla or mandible. Hyperflexion injury of the cervico-thoracic spine may also induce an approximation of the posterior tis­sues toward the tongue and epig­lottis. This is common in motor vehicle collisions (rear end or front end) and in falls onto the back of the head or upper back. Several other mechanisms of structural dysfunction are also currently un­der investigation. Assessment In cases of upper airway obstruc­tion, a specific airway obstruction test (AOT), developed by the au­thor, was also used to verify partial or complete obstruction. This in­volves placing the patient in an ac­centuated position of upper cervi­cal hyperflexion or moderate exten­sion, along with varying degrees of rotation or lateral flexion. The ease or difficulty of breathing, along with the amount of airflow turbu- lence noise, was recorded for each posi­tion. The dysfunctional structural pat­terns associated with snoring and sleep apnea (see above) were then evaluated using the standard Matrix Repatterning assessment. Method of Treatment A maximum of four treatments to resolve these patterns were administered over a maximum period of two months for ten patients with moderate to severe upper airway obstruction. Two of these cases were previously diagnosed with signifi­cant sleep apnea, as verified by sleep stud­ies. Results AOT was improved significantly in 80 percent of the cases. Patients (and spouses, or sleeping partners) reported a cessation or a significant improvement in snoring in 70 percent of the cases. The two individuals, diagnosed with sleep apnea, reported they were able to sleep through the night without the assistance of a CPAP machine, on which they were previously dependant. These findings suggest that structural dysfunction may play a role in the development of upper airway obstruction and that Matrix Repatteming procedures may be benefi­cial in the management of these condi­tions. The findings suggest that a ran­domized controlled trial within a broader population base might be indicated.EZS Key Terms: Matrix Repatlerning, Upper Airway Obstruction (UAO), Airway Obstruction Test (AOT), Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). References Hxar EN, Collop NA: The upper airway resistance syn­ drome. Chest 1W Apr: 115(4): 1127-39 The Matrix Repaltenting fragrant for Pain Relief, CSB Rolh. New Harbinger Publications. Oakland C'A, 2005. The Importance of Soft Tissues for Structural Support of the Body. SM Levin. Positional Release Therapy: As­ sessment tt Treatment a/ Mitseliloskelelal Dysfunc­ tion. K D'Ambrogio & GU Roth. Mosby-l-lscvicr. St. Louis, 1997. The Architecture of Life, OR Ingber, Scientific Ameri­ can. Vol. I. I'MS George li. Rolh. BSc. DC. NO. is President of The Rolh Institute, and on the Post-Gnutuale Faculty of Logan College of Chiropractic, lie can he reached by phone at 416-977-6X41. email at mfo6i-rolhmsiiuiie.com. <»■ visit w\mmlluiuiilulc.ciim. TAC's MISSION: We ore dedicated hi the continuing education & advancement of the chiropractic professional— YOU! Based on "The Architecture of Life" Scientific American 1998 Figure 1