for Rehab Patients

March 1 2003 Kim D. Christensen
for Rehab Patients
March 1 2003 Kim D. Christensen

P atients receiving rehab care for various chronic or acute neck problems often come across advertisements pro-moling special "neck support" pillows. Cervical sup­port pillows are recommended by many chiropractors, physio­therapists, and even surgeons. In a 1998 comparison study of three types of bed pillows, the authors write, "From a patient's perspective, neck support is an important part of a comprehen­sive physiotherapy program."1 Most bedding stores and sleep shops have at least one special pillow (and often there are sev­eral) for people with neck pain. While many doctors of chiropractic have recommended cer­vical support pillows for years, the scientific evidence for ben­efit has been skimpy, at best.15 Empirical and anecdotal reports from patients who report "improved sleep" and "decreased pain" have often been all that is available. Scientific Studies Let's review three scientific studies2"1 which have attempted to address some of the questions regarding cervical pillows. Although each of these three took different investigative ap­proaches and evaluated different pillows—which means that the findings are not directly comparable, and no definitive con­clusions can be made—the results are still worth consideration, since they give us some guidance in selecting a support pillow for our patients. Two-pillow comparison study. In a study2 performed at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Drs. Lavin, Pappagallo, and Kuhlemeier recruited forty-six subjects with chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headaches. The investiga­tion compared the subjects' daily pain levels, sleep quality, and medication consumption during one week on their own pillows, followed by two weeks each on two special neck support pil­lows. One of the pillows was a "cervical roll" style and the other was a "water-based cervical pillow." A statistically sig­nificant improvement in all scores was recorded when using the water pillow. Most subjects preferred the water pillow to their own pillow, and many had a very difficult time sleeping on the roll pillow. In fact, the researchers reported that some of the patients had to discontinue the two-week trial of the roll pillow due to significant discomfort. The investigators felt that the higher satisfaction ratings of the water pillow were due to its ability to conform better to the position and shape of the subjects' head and neck during vari­ous sleep positions. They believed that the roll pillow was not well tolerated due to its tendency to exaggerate the extension of the neck when supine (since there was no support under­neath the head). Single-style study. A small feasibility study1 at Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College seemed to find very different results. After recording two weeks of baseline pain ratings in thirty subjects with chronic neck pain, the researchers supplied a roll-type cervical pillow (a soft cylinder shape). Of those who persevered in using the pillow for four weeks (many subjects found the pillow to be very uncomfortable initially), most re­ported decreases in neck pain. However, three subjects de­scribed increased neck pain during use of the pillow, and two women dropped out of the trial, saying they were unable to tolerate the discomfort they experienced while using the cylin­drical pillow. Since the data collected do not reflect these "pil­low failures," and since there was no placebo or comparison with other pillows, this study's conclusions should be consid­ered overly optimistic. This demonstrates the difficulty in de­signing a scientifically valid and practically useful scientific investigation. Six-pillow comparison study. At Lund University Hospital in Sweden, researchers'1 studied the responses of fifty-five sub­jects to three nights on each of six different pillows. However, Scientific Studies Findings are not directly comparable, butthe results are still worth consideration, since they give us some guidanceinselectingasupportpillowforourpatients. Study Subjects Time Frame Pillows Findings Two-pillow comparison study 46 2 weeks on each pillow 0 Cervical Roll 0 Water-Based Cervical Pillow Most subjects preferred the water pillow to their own pillow, and many had a very difficult time sleeping on the roll pillow. Single-style study 30 4 weeks 0 roll-type cervical pillow (soft cylinder shape) Of those who persevered in using the pillow for four weeks (many subjects found the pillow to be very uncomfortable initially), most reported decreases in neck pain. Six-pillow comparison study 55 3 nights on each of six different pillows six pillows that varied in designs, materials, and construction One pillow stood out from the rest as the most comfortable, and also the most likely to decrease chronic pain. This pillow was made of soft polyurethane with two firm supports along the edges—one side high and the other side lower. none of the six pillows included their own pillows, and none was the same as the two types studied in the previous experi­ments. Since no "roll-type" pillows were included, we are left without a practical comparison to the other studies. The subjects in this experiment rated the six pillows for com­fort, but were also asked about pain reduction and sleep im­provement. The six pillows varied in their designs, materials, and construction. One pillow stood out from the rest as the most comfortable, and also the most likely to decrease chronic pain. Rated the "best" by both men and women, this pillow was made of soft polyurethane with two firm supports along the edges—one side high and the other side lower. This pillow supplied an easily tolerated support for the neck, while the two different sides provided a choice of heights. The pillow that rated the lowest was the one which most closely resembled a roll pillow. The investigators concluded that the optimal neck pillow to reduce neck pain and improve night rest was a soft, not-too-high pillow with support for the cervical lordosis from a choice of firmer cores. Since the participants used each pillow for only three nights, and only comfort ratings were evaluated, no con­clusions can be drawn from this study regarding the long-term effect of these pillows on pain or sleep patterns. The Search for Healthy Sleep When patients report chronic neck pain, cervicobrachialgia, and/or cervico-genic headaches, or when a patient has been instructed to perform rehabilitative cervical exercises, a cervical support pillow should be considered. This is especially true when the pain is described as being worse in the morning and improving during the day. If sleep disturbances are part of the history, or accompanied by a history of injury to the neck, a comfortable, yet supportive pillow should be a part of the chi­ropractic treatment recommendations. The right pillow will vary depending on the size of the person and on the amount of neck support that can be tolerated. Roll-type cervical pillows are initially uncomfortable, and may worsen some patients. A pillow which supplies a choice of sides is more likely to be helpful to a broader range of patients. It is also important to re-evaluate your patients' pillows, to ensure that proper cervical support continues over time. Recommending the use of a good cervical support pillow (and supplying one that has a good track record) can be one of the most useful adjunctive procedures to rehabilitative treatment of neck pain. Patients appreciate the doctor who goes beyond the office setting to give advice regarding supportive home activities, and even specific sleep recommendations. See page 59 for References Kim D. Chri.ilen.sen. DC. CCS P. CSCS. DACRB. founded the Sports Medicine & Rehab Clinics of Washington. He is a popular speaker, and participates as a team physician and consultant to high school and university athletic programs. Dr. Chrislensen is currently a postgraduate faculty member of numerous chiropractic colleges ami is the president of the American Chiropractic Association (ACAI Rehab Council. He is a "Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist, " certified by the Na­tional Strength and Conditioning Association. Dr. Chrislensen is the author of numerous publications and lexis on musculoskelelal rehabilita­tion and nutrition. He can be reached at Chiropractic Rehabilitation Assoc. 18604 NW 64th Avenue. Ridgefield. WA VS642 or by email at kimdchristensen(u)hotmail.com.